HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 06:53
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 505
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 480
32% 480 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 37.9
27% 36.3 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27
31% 34.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 412 420 414 421 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 428
Mixed 346
SusWrite 399
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 31.3
103% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 295
238% 336 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 134%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
4TB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 26.4
33% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 33: 3R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 19% 78 287 210 60 31.5" 1920 1080 SAM0F96 U32R59x
History: Score 30: 3R 4G 3B | Score 33: 3R 3G 9B
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 10,396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $111
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback