Fujitsu ESPRIMO C700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO C700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3064-A1
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 01:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 142
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 263
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 32 45 53 30 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 232
Write 182
Mixed 169
SusWrite 50
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 12.7
52% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 19.4
22% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
674GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 140 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 164
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 141
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
112GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 17
SusWrite 23.1
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/2G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO C700 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $282
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback