PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210729 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '22 at 13:10 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-9700K-$350
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
98% 174 Pts
|
86% 672 Pts
|
49% 736 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.9%
Above average
|
71% 78.4 fps
|
41% 57.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$68
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 822 770 528 15 105 MB/s
|
152%
Outstanding
|
197% 883 MB/s
|
142% 49.3 MB/s
|
272% 463 MB/s
|
![]() Intel Raid 0 Volume 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 545 557 572 569 568 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
101% 451 MB/s
|
26% 9.8 MB/s
|
16% 27.5 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown DDR4 3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
93% 32.4 GB/s
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4% | 17% | 24 | 321 | 235 | 60 | 0.7" | 1920 1080 | PHL0000 Philips FTV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $144Bench 86%, 283,822 samples | 1,751x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $350Bench 97%, 515,820 samples | 192x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $199Bench 94%, 325,710 samples | 187x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $280Bench 76%, 267,390 samples | 581x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 373,446 samples | 535x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $390Bench 89%, 574,087 samples | 404x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $492 |