Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , , , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 14:03
Run Duration685 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 280
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 844
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.41
5% 8.16 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 15.8
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 1,099
Mixed 912
275% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 25.5
188% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 53.9
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 27.1
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 201%
Great: 236%
WD WD20NPVT-00Z2TT0 2TB
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 85.4
Mixed 86.5
66% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.15
69% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
120GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 127
Write 112
Mixed 111
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
931GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 109
Write 98.6
Mixed 57.8
108% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.27
25% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
60GB free, PID 5530, Sandisk
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 3.14
Mixed 4.93
9% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.85
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 1.09
101% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 17%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB
27GB free, PID 6338
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 77.9
Write 76.1
Mixed 47.5
83% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.31
41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 2.67
Mixed 3.67
8% 8.29 MB/s
4K Read 1.79
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.003
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback