Asus M2N

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 18:44
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 37.8
38% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 39.8
8-Core 40.2
5% 40 Pts
64-Core 39.6
2% 39.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8
6% 7.87 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 8.4
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 64 61 67 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 66.9
Write 25.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 60.5
11% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 9.3
32% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 22.9
18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
370GB free
Firmware: CT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 59 62 60 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 64.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 59.7
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 3.2
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback