Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 01:21
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$672
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
65% Good
Memory 45.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 216
64% 121 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 812
79% 631 Pts
64-Core 2,615
176% 2,615 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 65%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E438) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
178% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 239
Parallax 514
180% 325 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 190
Splatting 280
176% 278 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 178%
Great: 208%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$269
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1990 1945 1748 1854 1947 1954 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,789
Write 3,040
Mixed 2,061
SusWrite 1,906
551% 2,449 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 56.8
206% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 590
470% 661 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 322%
Great: 530%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$264
711GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3377 3419 3343 3294 3322 919 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 2,876
Mixed 2,158
SusWrite 2,946
568% 2,502 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 72.9
240% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 824
615% 822 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 372%
Great: 496%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$395
366GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 35 37 38 39 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 84.4
Write 85.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 88.2
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60
148GB free
Firmware: 3.BHD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 27 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 24.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 24.4
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 24%
Seagate ST3500641NS 500GB
91GB free
Firmware: 3.AEH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 23.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 29.2
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 34%
Lacie 2big Dock Thunderbolt 3 Raid 0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 34 28 29 29 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 18% Great: 210%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 250GB
32GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 36 9.4 8.5 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 148
Write 59.4
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 22
72% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.5
119% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32%
Great: 40%
29GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 8.4 8 7.9 7.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 9.3
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 8%
USB DISK 2.0 11GB
0GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 26.2
Write 13.5
Mixed 1.7
14% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 2.5
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 177
22% 177 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 289%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $2,332
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback