To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070807
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration456 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 28.6
22% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 30.8
8-Core 29
4% 29.9 Pts
64-Core 28.7
2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-256 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 140 100 83 50 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 203
Write 156
Mixed 156
SusWrite 102
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 17.7
69% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 25.6
22% 31 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback