Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 18:44
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 277
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 939
84% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,537
95% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Asus(1043 8661) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 162
Parallax 166
135% 165 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 142
Splatting 122
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 200 199 191 195 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 480
Mixed 386
SusWrite 208
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 51.7
168% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
121GB free
Firmware: S3E00100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 412 428 427 180 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 501
Write 375
Mixed 414
SusWrite 298
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 27.8
113% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 56.1
105% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
147GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 74 74 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 61
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 73.1
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST500DM002-1BD142 2TB
305GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 81 83 82 82 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 68.7
Write 59
Mixed 44
SusWrite 80.5
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
201GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 171 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 32
SusWrite 169
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $552
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback