Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400-$134 24,459 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 75.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 709 75% 597 Pts	64-Core 931 58% 931 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730 14,644 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.11% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 8.6 0% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.11% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.0.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 17 53 20 42 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 386 Write 41.4 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 28.8 27% 128 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 14.9 69% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 92.8 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 19.8 24% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x

RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBTeamBench 86%, 2,176 samples	23x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBTeamBench 42%, 469 samples	21x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	21x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $377

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16