| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3062-A1 |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150618 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '22 at 14:28 |
| Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.1%
Good
|
65% 110 Pts
|
40% 303 Pts
|
19% 307 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
26% 32.3 fps
|
24% 30.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 26 56 82 102 80 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
59% 80.6 MB/s
|
140% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
31GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 64 63 64 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
44% 59.9 MB/s
|
138% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
46.6%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
54% 74.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO E900 Builds (Compare 97 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 45x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 41x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $250 |