Asus X540NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X540NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540NA
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 77.9
30% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 71.4
8-Core 72
10% 71.7 Pts
64-Core 70
4% 70 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 1DE0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 53 69 74 69 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 320
Write 270
Mixed 134
SusWrite 78.2
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 4.7
29% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 29.8
41% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540NA Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback