Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '17 at 23:13
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 67.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 736 68% 566 Pts	64-Core 2,438 151% 2,438 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 200 Parallax 192 143% 189 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 163 Splatting 120 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 898GB free Firmware: 8.2 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 1,077 Write 946 Mixed 939 220% 987 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 25.6 91% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 56.8 49% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 413%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,914 Write 1,110 Mixed 1,189 310% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 21.5 135% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 71.9 DQ Write 93.5 DQ Mixed 25.8 35% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 236%
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3TB free Firmware: 8.2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 71.2 Write 64.4 Mixed 73.6 53% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.25 84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 103%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 8,475 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 779GB free Firmware: 0143 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 111 Write 110 Mixed 113 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.3 90% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	MC Read 51.9 MC Write 59.1 MC Mixed 55.4 158% 55.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 23.9 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $829

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16