MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B93
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) (all builds)
Memory	56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '22 at 04:22
Run Duration	288 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 67.6 1-Core 140 2-Core 278 86% 162 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 870 84% 690 Pts	64-Core 1,457 90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.47 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 141 Reflection 143 Parallax 143 115% 142 fps	Gravity 143 Splatting 142 126% 142 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,414 Write 1,979 Mixed 1,621 445% 2,004 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 82.9 281% 99.3 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 97.5 85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 201GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 419 420 429 436 437 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 420 Mixed 333 SusWrite 421 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 39.8 141% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 99.2 DQ Mixed 45.6 41% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 116%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 499GB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 33 34 33 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 25.4 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 35.1 20% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 121 118 118 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 144 Write 123 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 118 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 115 117 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 97.1 Write 94.1 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 116 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 69%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 95 104 107 103 104 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 104 Write 98.6 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 99.3 124% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 59%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 8.5TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 151 146 143 145 147 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79% Very good	Read 182 Write 186 Mixed 189 SusWrite 149 241% 177 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.9 298% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 30.7 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 36.3 46% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.3% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.7 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 25.9 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	797x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	674x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $15Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	610x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	429x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	351x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	324x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	369x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	318x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	213x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	197x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	126x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	124x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16