Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds)
Memory	17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140417
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 14:09
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 136 60% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 392 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 42.7 Parallax 40.2 32% 40.9 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 28.8 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 284 286 286 287 288 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 434 Write 404 Mixed 340 SusWrite 293 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 47.3 159% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 260 195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 737GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 107 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M4X1866C9 CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M4X1866C9 24GB 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.3% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	441x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	215x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	48x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 66%, 6,389 samples	22x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16