Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 02:02
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 266 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 855 85% 691 Pts	64-Core 1,085 67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341A) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 60.3 Parallax 78.3 48% 65.9 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 43.7 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 307 309 313 311 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 934 Write 1,464 Mixed 768 SusWrite 484 206% 912 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 70.3 239% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 964 DQ Write 1099 DQ Mixed 990 757% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 280%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 12GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 8.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 39.5 Write 19.6 SusWrite 8.7 24% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB 10,297 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 26.2 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 27.6 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	475x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	345x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	265x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	159x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	130x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16