Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 67% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 72.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 997 94% 781 Pts	64-Core 1,195 74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 36,301 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 880A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.12.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 29.1 18% 23.5 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 25.2 Splatting 21.5 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1683 Write 1,774 Mixed 1,286 353% 1,581 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 83.9 288% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 762 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 304 323% 539 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 2x8GB 1,312 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 27.8 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 25.9 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 36,301 samples	100x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	7x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	7x

RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 3200 C22 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 79%, 1,165 samples	5x
KF3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GBKingstonBench 91%, 1,874 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16