Asus Z10PA-U8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PA-U8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-U8 Series
Memory122.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín, 1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161006
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 626
59% 489 Pts
64-Core 1,690
105% 1,690 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 73.6
38% 60.2 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 43.7
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 76 75 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 462
Write 430
Mixed 403
SusWrite 95.8
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 33.1
122% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 128%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 336 384 395 396 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 298
Mixed 291
SusWrite 366
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 31.1
120% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 213
178% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 119%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 130 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 128
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 147 146 149 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 143
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 148
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 85%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$65
60GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 125 121 122 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 71
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 122
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PA-U8 Series Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Asus Z10PA-U8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $479
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback