Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 20:21
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 726
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 209
Parallax 174
135% 183 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 150
Splatting 129
124% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,991
Write 643
Mixed 440
221% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 48
212% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1059
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 881
676% 922 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
210GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 426 392 249 303 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 484
Mixed 397
SusWrite 338
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 63.4
214% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 247
217% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 126%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB
45GB free
Firmware: 1.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 92 90 91 89 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 154
Write 117
Mixed 135
SusWrite 91.2
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 32.5
129% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 112
89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 55%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
814GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 1324 1333 1331 1330 1332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1329
Mixed 1,361
SusWrite 1,328
311% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 75.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 101
327% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,506
DQ Write 1,150
DQ Mixed 1,285
973% 1,314 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 302%
Great: 488%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
101GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 97.1
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
391% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $993
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback