Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 07:51
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 179
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 648
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 60.6
45% 48.2 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 62.3
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 158 153 157 153 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
PNY SSD2SC480G1SA754D117-542 480GB
54GB free
Firmware: N0815B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 329 200 363 277 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 476
Write 371
Mixed 309
SusWrite 286
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 24.7
84% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 112
93% 140 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 104%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
908GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 87 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 96
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 92.6
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
116GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 42 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 38.6
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 45.4
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
797GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 106 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 112
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
595GB free
Firmware: JP4OA25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 106 114 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 105
Write 117
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 112
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback