HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 171 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 506 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 44.8 Parallax 41.1 32% 41.8 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 30 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS600M1TB 1TB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 391 393 397 402 400 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 466 Write 389 Mixed 348 SusWrite 395 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 21.5 99% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 33 79% 158 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 99%
Hua722020ala330 45W6276 59Y1813IBM 2TB 855 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3HH SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 105 106 106 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 95.1 Write 97.6 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 105 64% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 059B CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.6 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	965x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	400x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	380x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16