Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 18:23
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400-$134 24,459 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 83.9 1-Core 147 2-Core 270 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 533 8-Core 903 87% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,128 70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 881D) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.6% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 142 Parallax 102 90% 118 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 103 Splatting 89.4 89% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8120G 120GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 47 77 58 39 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 474 Write 303 Mixed 291 SusWrite 78.4 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 40.8 147% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 122 111% 172 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 83%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54 5,987 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 230GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 1161 1109 868 205 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 1,415 Write 1,154 Mixed 1,144 SusWrite 763 251% 1,119 MB/s	4K Read 65.5 4K Write 210 4K Mixed 92.3 329% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 1,116 DQ Mixed 805 665% 943 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 239%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 884GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 35 46 47 47 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-8GIS 2x8GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 25.1 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 22.3 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	554x
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	326x
Core i7-11700KIntel $270Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	300x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	452x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	290x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	169x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	85x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	83x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	82x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16