Medion Erazer X5313 F/B568

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Medion Erazer X5313 F/B568 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 02:09
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 220 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 610 63% 507 Pts	64-Core 608 38% 608 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 174 Parallax 162 148% 173 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 136 Splatting 118 117% 147 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 412 Write 16.9 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 11.2 24% 116 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 11.5 58% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 4.8 DQ Mixed 13.1 25% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 61%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 127GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 473 478 476 484 485 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 449 Mixed 442 SusWrite 478 106% 471 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 65 213% 74.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 152GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 96 97 97 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 96.6 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 842 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.2 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5313 F/B568 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: Medion Erazer X5313 F/B568

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 842 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $978

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16