Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 204 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 484 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Legend(17AA 3A2D) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 45.1 Parallax 31.9 27% 36.9 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 30 Splatting 24.1 22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3A2D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 6.3 5% 5.47 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 10.6 6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB 4,082 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 118 116 114 108 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 770 Write 123 Mixed 209 SusWrite 115 66% 304 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 33.7 136% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 177 136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 132%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 676GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 114 120 113 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 185 Write 122 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 115 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 3.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	665x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	526x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	200x

SSD
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples	182x
MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,504 samples	155x
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	128x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	340x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	302x
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GBRamaxelBench 43%, 3,986 samples	192x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16