Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211210
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '22 at 17:22
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics 3,488 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 217 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 582 59% 478 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13014.8 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 29.1 15% 20.3 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 15.8 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB 4,102 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111B1L SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 264 211 199 390 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 1,389 Write 982 Mixed 826 SusWrite 248 191% 861 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 26.1 144% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 140 154% 258 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 191%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 51GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 81 81 81 80 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 85.9 Write 84.3 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 80.6 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 105GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 186 Write 43.9 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 38.1 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB 6,240 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 18 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	283x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16