Acer Swift SF314-54

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 72%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-54  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Strongbow_KL
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 540
61% 476 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1269) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.87 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G39TND-N210A 512GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 402 267 272 395 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 385
Write 401
Mixed 242
SusWrite 325
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 23.4
108% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 235
208% 314 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 95%
MXT-USB Storage Device 1TB
1TB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.5 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 10.8
8% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-54 Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 52%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-54

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback