Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 143 2-Core 274 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 960 89% 742 Pts	64-Core 1,508 93% 1,508 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 133 Parallax 122 96% 124 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 130 Splatting 112 95% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 707GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1300 951 990 980 966 924 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,428 Write 2,252 Mixed 1,557 SusWrite 1,018 406% 1,814 MB/s	4K Read 54 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 71.7 237% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,065 DQ Write 706 DQ Mixed 890 663% 887 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 158GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 194 190 191 189 190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 504 Write 348 Mixed 235 SusWrite 199 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 34.5 136% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 198 168% 250 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 610GB free Firmware: X41320RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 260 246 234 258 207 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 485 Write 402 Mixed 346 SusWrite 251 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 33 110% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 212 192% 294 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 25.7 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 36.3 SC Mixed 26.7 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,088x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,148x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,081x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	741x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	696x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	539x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	669x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	438x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	410x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $781

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16