Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 09:46
Run Duration	388 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 66 2-Core 103 55% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 233 28% 216 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.8.2 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.2% Below average	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 63.2 Parallax 63.6 23% 51.7 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 49.3 47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4835 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3730 (B1) Unknown 93 93 236 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 56 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 119 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17845918492	72.7% Very good	Read 511 Write 308 Mixed 274 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 13.7 80% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 54.5 88% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 516GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896895159 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 992 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1732 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 726 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 994 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 994 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 184684773415 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9	72.4% Very good	Read 133 Write 120 Mixed 112 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.09 35% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID 6998 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 8.09 Mixed 5.12 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.008 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 5%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.89% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 7.61 Mixed 9.83 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.35 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.59 85% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	131x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16