Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 80.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 268 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 870 84% 690 Pts	64-Core 1,084 67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2005 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 95.1 Parallax 58.6 57% 74.6 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 75.4 Splatting 70.3 58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 429 426 424 363 362 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 392 Write 412 Mixed 384 SusWrite 404 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 53.6 165% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 150 127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70 2,932 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 444GB free Firmware: M2CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 440 438 441 442 441 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 439 Mixed 404 SusWrite 439 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 44.7 150% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 183 142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB 13,393 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	88% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 34.7 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 35.5 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,634x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,257x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,231x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,071x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,104x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	863x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16