Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-S UCC (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 14:09
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,057 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 95.6 40% 63.6 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 163 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 152 10% 152 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 73,995 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 17 15% 17.5 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 15.4 16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256G B 256GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW20 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 165 Write 133 Mixed 124 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 7.3 50% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 51.7 DQ Mixed 15.3 19% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 80%
Maxtor STM380215A 80GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 74GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 64 Write 65.6 Mixed 37.8 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB 4,629 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 10GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 15.2 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 15.3 23% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2 124% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 423,404 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 38: 5R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	38%	37	130	64	60	24"	1920 1080	AOC246A 2460G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 43%, 20,817 samples	170x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 49%, 18,318 samples	127x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 58%, 44,007 samples	72x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 7,730 samples	200x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 70,978 samples	59x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 177,443 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $22Bench 68%, 443,928 samples	49x
A400 120GBKingston $19Bench 61%, 152,463 samples	37x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $39Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	34x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 423,404 samples	541x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 438,079 samples	417x
1x4GBUnknownBench 26%, 155,635 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $22

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446	Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $544	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $373	Nvidia RTX 3050 $292	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17