Asus M2N

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M2N (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	40% Below average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 39.2 2-Core 75.8 40% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 77.6 8-Core 77.3 10% 77.4 Pts	64-Core 78.7 5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 21C0) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	8.38% Terrible	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 12 Parallax 8.1 9% 10.5 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 8 6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.38% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 87 81 72 74 31 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 183 Write 126 Mixed 133 SusWrite 82.3 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 22.1 72% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 46.8 DQ Mixed 26.2 23% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 88%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 123GB free Firmware: JF10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 73 74 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 66.5 Write 74 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 73.4 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	8x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	5x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	2x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	1x
A S340 120GBApacerBench 57%, 54 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	3x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16