| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 400B4C/400B5C/200B4C/200B5C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130814 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '22 at 23:17 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.8%
Average
|
38% 57.6 Pts
|
18% 138 Pts
|
8% 137 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E4) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.91%
Terrible
|
2% 1.8 fps
|
2% 2.37 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 229 223 82 78 80 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
49% 221 MB/s
|
44% 13.3 MB/s
|
35% 66.2 MB/s
|
|
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.4 MB/s
|
3.54%
Terrible
|
7% 6.32 MB/s
|
10% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.2%
Above average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
37% 108 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 400B4C/400B5C/200B4C/200B5C Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 400B4C/400B5C/200B4C/200B5C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 10x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 21x |
| NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $52 |