| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '22 at 17:29 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | KWT-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
83% 150 Pts
|
76% 606 Pts
|
45% 731 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.09
|
60.7%
Good
|
64% 77.5 fps
|
53% 65.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 127 123 78 107 106 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
68% 303 MB/s
|
70% 24.6 MB/s
|
45% 82.4 MB/s
|
|
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
65GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 80 55 52 56 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
32% 146 MB/s
|
44% 15.2 MB/s
|
40% 72.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
625GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 165 162 162 163 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
108% 146 MB/s
|
242% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
49.2%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
55% 72.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 332x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 153x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 66x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 88x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 73x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 71x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |