| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Biostar B250MHC (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201022 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '22 at 16:33 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.5%
Good
|
77% 137 Pts
|
44% 332 Pts
|
20% 326 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Biostar(1565 3114) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
|
5.85%
Terrible
|
5% 6.23 fps
|
7% 8.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 404 248 277 288 316 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
90% 399 MB/s
|
181% 64.8 MB/s
|
239% 341 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 859B CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
76.6%
Very good
|
78% 27.4 GB/s
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
47% 84.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B250MHC Builds (Compare 232 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar B250MHC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 28x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $127 |