PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-I LX R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130827 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 16 '22 at 16:00 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
54%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84C2) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 157 175 169 150 187 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
253GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 12x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 10x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 13x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $42 |