Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300HF 6,965 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Memory 16.7 1-Core 37 2-Core 65.2 21% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 210 20% 166 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Legend(17AA 3A41) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.49 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.7% Poor	Lighting 27.2 Reflection 22.5 Parallax 23.9 22% 24.5 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 17.8 27% 34.6 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 464 Write 542 Mixed 296 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 19.5 67% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 52.9 DQ Mixed 80.2 77% 128 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB 16,227 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 346 12% 346 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	2,838x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,245x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	1,176x

SSD
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples	938x
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 156%, 10,396 samples	501x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	466x

RAM
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	1,319x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	1,081x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	860x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16