Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 164
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 289
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8641) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 8.9
6% 6.73 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,936
Write 3,367
Mixed 4,062
846% 3,788 MB/s
4K Read 382
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 204
934% 254 MB/s
DQ Read 1,365
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,038
805% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
705GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 149 160 155 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 148
Mixed 101
SusWrite 156
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.7 6.8 7.6 7.6 7.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.3
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 8%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
931GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 105 112 106 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 109
134% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback