Asrock H470M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

7 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H470M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 12:38
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 33,738 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 233 86% 148 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 648 67% 528 Pts	64-Core 653 44% 653 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155 994,730 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 36 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 36.8 29% 39.6 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 26.6 30% 33.4 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,144 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07656 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 1.9 2 10 8.6 5.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 460 Write 34.8 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 11.2 30% 143 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 15.9 86% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 131 80% 89 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 99%
Seagate ST1000NM0053-1C1173 1TB 689 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 659GB free Firmware: SS06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 157 157 157 154 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 144 Write 137 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 156 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H2666G 2x8GB 579 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 23.5 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 24.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	HAN2700 S27FHV144HZ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H470M-HVS Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H470M-HVS

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $129Bench 86%, 132,450 samples	145x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 83%, 33,738 samples	138x
Core i3-10105FIntel $75Bench 84%, 9,070 samples	35x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 70,978 samples	48x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 994,730 samples	43x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 28,672 samples	32x

SSD
240GB 240GBMacrovipBench 71%, 58 samples	42x
A400 240GBKingston $22Bench 66%, 422,525 samples	37x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 240,738 samples	22x

RAM
8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 444 samples	37x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 230,743 samples	17x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 23,909 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446	Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3050 $292	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378	Nvidia RTX 3070 $535	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17