Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$161
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 244
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 438
29% 438 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
MSI(1462 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.7% Good
Lighting 82
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 70.6
66% 77.3 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 66.5
58% 67.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$38
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 234
Write 272
Mixed 259
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 12
47% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 33.1
40% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
30GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 96 95 96 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 166
Write 142
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 94.9
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 69 61 75 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 7.5
Write 62.2
Mixed 63
SusWrite 78.3
83% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
213% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $534
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $198Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $246Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $20Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback