Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 11:05
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180 43,966 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 82.3 1-Core 168 2-Core 314 101% 188 Pts	4-Core 615 8-Core 976 98% 795 Pts	64-Core 1,245 77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.7% Good	Lighting 90.7 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 76.8 74% 85.6 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 79.6 Splatting 70 59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 478 Write 324 Mixed 262 78% 355 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 27.9 109% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 140 118% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 624GB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 94 92 93 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 77.9 Write 80.1 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 92.5 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100 3,663 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 387GB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 81.1 Write 13.6 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 94.5 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.5% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 24.5 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $270Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	975x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	718x
Core i9-11900KIntel $265Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	448x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	377x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	343x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	332x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	273x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	246x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	199x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	104x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $676

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16