MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7992
Motherboard	MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160826
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 10:55
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 134 61% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 427 42% 341 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.6% Very good	Lighting 98.8 Reflection 100 Parallax 104 80% 101 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 91.4 Splatting 89.2 75% 91.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 241 232 249 229 256 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 423 Mixed 416 SusWrite 233 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 48.1 158% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 29.6 86% 186 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 407GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 246 301 303 307 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 311 Mixed 407 SusWrite 272 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 51.8 169% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 76.5 74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 129%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 188GB free Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 311 245 65 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 438 Write 273 Mixed 307 SusWrite 160 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 27.6 115% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 154 133% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 91%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 50GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 168 179 192 193 193 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 442 Write 186 Mixed 216 SusWrite 174 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 13.8 94% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 29.1 47% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 489GB free, PID 0901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 122 124 124 124 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 140 Write 129 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 117 131% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 508GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 33 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 33.3 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 32.6 40% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 887GB free, PID 0901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 113 109 110 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 147 Write 146 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 106 134% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 4x8GB 1,306 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.6% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 16.9 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	86x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	24x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	13x

SSD
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	11x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16