Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 10:28
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 92%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$330
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 70.5
1-Core 212
2-Core 423
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 824
8-Core 1,583
143% 1,204 Pts
64-Core 2,888
179% 2,888 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 147
Parallax 147
122% 148 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 129
Splatting 116
112% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 389 189 161 162 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,724
Write 2,087
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 510
342% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 95.6
334% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,574
DQ Write 1,416
DQ Mixed 1237
998% 1,409 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 270%
Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
195GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 321 321 320 320 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 483
Mixed 398
SusWrite 332
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 64.3
221% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 336
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
212GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 127 131 131 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 127
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
13GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 9.5 8.6 8.6 8.9 9.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 8.4
15% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 240 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $974
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback