Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 days ago, 5 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 10:10
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$371
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 211
2-Core 400
128% 235 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,524
145% 1168 Pts
64-Core 2,181
146% 2,181 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 123%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$400
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 193
Parallax 181
162% 192 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 152
Splatting 128
131% 166 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 148%
Great: 142%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 325 326 327 324 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,459
Write 1,471
Mixed 1270
SusWrite 352
307% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 100
363% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 1,117
DQ Mixed 1,016
774% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 278%
Great: 278%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
568GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1574 89 82 85 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,089
Write 1,707
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 640
264% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 83.9
328% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 880
671% 893 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 223%
Great: 286%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$80
875GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 168 157 164 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 164
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 164
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$109
601GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 160 162 163 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 76.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 161
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 43.7
134% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 35.6
109% 38.1 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,739
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $198Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $248Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $20Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback