Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 09:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-12900K-$570
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 197
2-Core 389
116% 220 Pts
4-Core 779
8-Core 1,514
142% 1,146 Pts
64-Core 2,962
199% 2,962 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 151
Parallax 150
122% 150 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 117
112% 142 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 238 184 162 175 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 1,916
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 366
295% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 78.3
271% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,382
DQ Mixed 1,219
983% 1,387 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 228%
Great: 308%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
195GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 319 319 321 313 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 441
Mixed 391
SusWrite 325
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 50.6
174% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 336
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
199GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 107 113 112 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 75.1
Write 76.6
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 107
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 105%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
13GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.9 9.2 8.7 8.9 9.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 6.9
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 8.8
14% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.6
163% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 52: 6R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 18% 112 106 5 240 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 256%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,694
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback