Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10700-$425
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 281
96% 170 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 872
91% 712 Pts
64-Core 1171
79% 1171 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 43.6
27% 36.9 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 33.8
34% 40.4 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$170
862GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 2094 2090 2092 2115 2096 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2593
Write 2,286
Mixed 2,392
SusWrite 2,058
525% 2,332 MB/s
4K Read 79.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 103
329% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 916
695% 946 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 375%
Great: 478%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$219
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 487 487 488 482 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 487
Mixed 408
SusWrite 484
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 50.7
176% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 344
263% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$300
90GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 408 405 404 404 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 403
Write 416
Mixed 271
SusWrite 406
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 39.5
159% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 318
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
152GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 62
SusWrite 104
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 20.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 27" 1280 720 ACI27E2 ASUS VG278HR
Typical TUF GAMING B460-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $681
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $198Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $246Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $20Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback