Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 207 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 403 37% 312 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.44% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 8 Parallax 9.2 6% 8.2 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 6.7 7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.44% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D256 256GB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: CT22005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 347 160 146 115 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 1,018 Write 564 Mixed 672 SusWrite 212 137% 616 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 15.4 129% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 453 330% 438 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 161%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 24.4 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 33.5 SC Mixed 17.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	939x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	509x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples	13x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 724 samples	503x
CL1-8D256 256GBSsstcBench 130%, 516 samples	170x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GBSamsungBench 152%, 710 samples	88x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16