Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Positivo POS-PIQ67CG (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ67CG
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 04:23
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 56 2-Core 125 52% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 206 28% 205 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(7377 0000) 2GB CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 21.9 Parallax 16.1 14% 18.5 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 18.8 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB 6,756 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 400 393 243 188 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 423 Mixed 421 SusWrite 280 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 46.8 151% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 265 222% 320 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 128%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.44% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 7.2 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 8.4 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.1 57% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.44% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston termiter 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 14.4 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIQ67CG Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	22x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	16x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	13x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	18x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBCrucial $44Bench 171%, 6,626 samples	3x

RAM
termiter 8GBKingstonBench 51%, 34 samples	13x
termiter 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 12 samples	9x
76.B146G.C340C 2x4GBUnknownBench 46%, 100 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16