MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 02:16
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
97% 171 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 868
88% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,122
75% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$330
Nvidia(10DE 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 154
Parallax 108
100% 128 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.1
87% 111 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$91
686GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 348 353 361 358 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 368
Mixed 312
SusWrite 350
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 33
119% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 267
218% 309 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 125%
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1226A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 107 107 110 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 2,165
Write 597
Mixed 162
SusWrite 132
164% 764 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 37.4
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 141
123% 191 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 146%
Great: 270%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
53GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78
Write 65.6
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 77.3
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$40
184GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 82.7
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
355GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 87 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 74.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 86.4
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 28.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 29.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 35: 4R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 58% 26 335 272 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS2782 VG279
History: Score 16: 0R 3G 7B | Score 35: 4R 2G 9B
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 25,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,015
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $250Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback