Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 days ago, 4 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$690
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 1,017
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 2948
198% 2948 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 187
Parallax 207
150% 193 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 192
Splatting 158
162% 201 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 156%
Great: 197%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 419 372 362 357 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 484
Mixed 374
SusWrite 390
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 57.8
196% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 363
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
767GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 487 483 471 484 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 490
Mixed 442
SusWrite 480
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.6
197% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$37
375GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 100 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 80
Write 76.4
Mixed 54
SusWrite 98.2
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
693GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 117 119 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 122
Write 136
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 118
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 260D 5TB
2TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 88 89 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 85.8
Write 85.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 88.5
111% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.8
229% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Thermaltake R017D408GX2-4400C19A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 29.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 42: 4R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 47% 34 317 256 165 27" 1920 1080 AUS2720 VG278
History: Score 34: 4R 4G 2B | Score 42: 4R 5G 7B
Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 5,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $990
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $245Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback