Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 21:43
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 321
106% 191 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,037
105% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,596
107% 1,596 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$600
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 204
Parallax 195
175% 205 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 148
Splatting 124
130% 168 fps
Poor: 151%
This bench: 154%
Great: 180%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 475 476 475 485 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 1,008
Mixed 130
SusWrite 553
166% 752 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 39.6
123% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 125
136% 241 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 138%
Great: 324%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
118GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 425 322 323 323 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 481
Mixed 458
SusWrite 362
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.4
196% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 120%
Great: 131%
Kingston A400 240GB-$30
129GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 245 135 183 208 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 443
Mixed 414
SusWrite 221
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 32.2
153% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 1.4
80% 188 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 98%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$150
16GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 476
Write 464
Mixed 380
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 47.5
172% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 171
183% 303 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
368GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 166 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 159
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 167
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C14-8GFX CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C14-8GFX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 35
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 43: 4R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 21% 91 313 236 144 24" 1920 1080 AOC2460 G2460
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 6,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback