Emachines eM350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmachines eM350  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer eM350
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20% Poor
Memory 38.6
1-Core 6.1
2-Core 10.9
16% 18.5 Pts
4-Core 10.8
8-Core 11
2% 10.9 Pts
64-Core 11
1% 11 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 106 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 221
Write 93.8
Mixed 113
SusWrite 105
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 16.3
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 54.1
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 44
34% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4354324732533830304D2E4D3136464D 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.08% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback